Remember the unforgettable scene in "Roots" when the slave Toby is corporeally punished and instead of caving-in to the demands of his master through the crack of the overseer's whip he defies them by exclaiming out loud for all to hear that he was not the slave Toby, but the proud African warrior Kunte Kinte.
I've used a reference to this character before of course back in 2006 when I felt I was unfairly being singled-out by my-then-nemesis Cheryl at Symantec.
Back then I had to placate. I had to stand down. I had to take it.
But a lot has happened between 2006 and 2012.
Susan had the audacity to send me an email notifying me that I was now in jeopardy of disciplinary action in the form of 3-days suspension without pay.
The Center has a policy about clocking-in which states, pretty much word-for-word, that an employee would be suspended for 3 days without pay if they accrue three infractions in a rolling 2-month period. These infractions are defined explicitly as clocking-in later than or earlier than 5 minutes of one's starting time.
Last week I admittedly was late by 7 minutes because I forgot that my schedule had been modified in order to accommodate June's PTO. I accept this is a legitimate infraction.
But Susan is counting a clock-in of mine two weeks earlier when I clocked in 8 minutes early in order to cover for June's lateness on that date. You see, June had called saying she'd be late around 10:30 pm, I didn't know she had called in late but, as usual, I had arrived more than 10 minutes early for my shift. So I chose to clock-in once the evening shift told me I was going to be alone for a while. A counting of the controlled meds needs to be done each shift change and since it was told to me that June wasn't going to be in until midnight I knew I'd have to count off with Phyllis in order for her to leave her shift on time.
So by this account, I'm up to 2 infractions within 30 days, well within the 2 rolling months of the policy. In the email it says if I have another infraction before April 8th, I'll be suspended.
I've answered her with a tersely worded reply, let me tell you. I even go so far as to presume to school her on the definition of "using one's judgement".
It's after 9:00. I'm sure she's read it. But I haven't seen a reply by email just yet.
It may be she's busy oiling that bloodied and chaffed leather cat-o-nine tails.
Do your best, bitch!
But you'll remember my name.
You WILL remember my name!
UPDATE: Her reply pointed out that the 2/8 infraction was NOT the night I clocked-in early but another night I'd forgotten about in which I was actually late because of traffic. She was not pleased with the "disrespectful tone" of my email. Needless to say I now have a cowed expression having been forced to eat crow pie.
I guess my name is Toby after all.
I've used a reference to this character before of course back in 2006 when I felt I was unfairly being singled-out by my-then-nemesis Cheryl at Symantec.
Back then I had to placate. I had to stand down. I had to take it.
But a lot has happened between 2006 and 2012.
Susan had the audacity to send me an email notifying me that I was now in jeopardy of disciplinary action in the form of 3-days suspension without pay.
The Center has a policy about clocking-in which states, pretty much word-for-word, that an employee would be suspended for 3 days without pay if they accrue three infractions in a rolling 2-month period. These infractions are defined explicitly as clocking-in later than or earlier than 5 minutes of one's starting time.
Last week I admittedly was late by 7 minutes because I forgot that my schedule had been modified in order to accommodate June's PTO. I accept this is a legitimate infraction.
But Susan is counting a clock-in of mine two weeks earlier when I clocked in 8 minutes early in order to cover for June's lateness on that date. You see, June had called saying she'd be late around 10:30 pm, I didn't know she had called in late but, as usual, I had arrived more than 10 minutes early for my shift. So I chose to clock-in once the evening shift told me I was going to be alone for a while. A counting of the controlled meds needs to be done each shift change and since it was told to me that June wasn't going to be in until midnight I knew I'd have to count off with Phyllis in order for her to leave her shift on time.
So by this account, I'm up to 2 infractions within 30 days, well within the 2 rolling months of the policy. In the email it says if I have another infraction before April 8th, I'll be suspended.
I've answered her with a tersely worded reply, let me tell you. I even go so far as to presume to school her on the definition of "using one's judgement".
It's after 9:00. I'm sure she's read it. But I haven't seen a reply by email just yet.
It may be she's busy oiling that bloodied and chaffed leather cat-o-nine tails.
Do your best, bitch!
But you'll remember my name.
You WILL remember my name!
UPDATE: Her reply pointed out that the 2/8 infraction was NOT the night I clocked-in early but another night I'd forgotten about in which I was actually late because of traffic. She was not pleased with the "disrespectful tone" of my email. Needless to say I now have a cowed expression having been forced to eat crow pie.
I guess my name is Toby after all.